• Animats 3 hours ago |
    "or paying for the required license?"

    Where was the acceptance of a contract requiring that? Microsoft just gave people a free upgrade.

    • PittleyDunkin 36 minutes ago |
      I imagine the definition of "upgrade" depends on the needs of the customer. The merchant of the license is inherently unable to evaluate this. Installing software without explicit consent, especially not-functionally-equivalent-software, is inherently wrong.
      • causality0 5 minutes ago |
        It's amazing to me that we're all so chill about a company in Redmond having root access to our PCs because they pinky-swear they will never misuse it.
        • ranger_danger 3 minutes ago |
          And yet when you call it what it is (a backdoor) people get highly offended. Same thing with ubuntu snaps or really anything that updates automatically.
  • ahoka 3 hours ago |
    “installs itself” = a 3rd party patch management product installed the update
    • heraldgeezer 2 hours ago |
      Or if you auto approve security updates. As is common. Azure VMs even default to auto-update pulls from MS.

      https://imgur.com/a/RvEx3yn

    • Brian_K_White 2 hours ago |
      A 3rd party tool did what MS told it to do.
  • gnabgib 3 hours ago |
    Discussion (75 points, 18 hours ago, 26 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42057451
  • troseph 2 hours ago |
    David Attenborough voiced "Sysadmins are cautious by nature" in my head.
  • mattsimpson 18 minutes ago |
    We got an urgent notice today from our central IT group warning of this catastrophic screw up of epic proportions, and I could hardly believe it.

    This is way worse than the Crowdstrike debacle.