• Terr_ 6 days ago |
    Oof, as if there weren't enough reasons to hate a monopolistic and exploitative company.
  • GuestFAUniverse 6 days ago |
    <sarcasm> value-added science </sarcasm>
  • ramblenode 6 days ago |
    Kind of a "reverse plagiarism".

    It seems to have been purely stylistic, but that's still unacceptable, especially since it broke conventions of the field.

  • Yaa101 6 days ago |
    So this will be one of the ways that people will die from AI
  • jffhn 5 days ago |
    Reminds me of this quote from Schopenhauer:

    "My curse upon anyone who, in future editions of my works, knowingly changes anything in them, be it a sentence, or even just a word, a syllable, a letter, a punctuation mark."

    • sam_goody 4 days ago |
      BTW, I have seen the similar in several older texts.

      One example is the Jewish lawbook "Toldos Adam V'Chava"[1]. Although many old religious texts have been reprinted with clear modern typesetting, no-one wanted to re-typeset this until recently because of the curse.

      On the plus side, we know exactly what the author wrote 800 years later, even if it is hard to read.

      [1]: https://hebrewbooks.org/10180