For all of the “but I have nothing to hide” crowd, you need to modify your slogan to, “but I have nothing to hide, right now.”
Seriously, though, what would the HIPAA violation be for location data? Knowledge of someone going to a doctor's office doesn't sound like a HIPAA violation. AFAIK, violations only relate to what is communicated between doctors (and other healthcare professionals) and patients.
The web page below has quite some discussion on what this means for patient privacy and how to disable certain location services on your phone.
[1] https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance...)
Any else that I've missed?
It would also be a fascinating dataset to explore.
How's that worked out for us the last billion times?
Though I don’t think that would even work, as people’s anger would be directed at the public directory rather then the source of the data and how it was gathered…
(Edit: Don’t actually do this, as it could / probably will, do more harm than good. But until the majority of people get angry at such data collection, it will just continue to happen)
I think at some point the system needs to switch to aggregating violence/damage inflicted when it's against thousands/millions of people. A business can't just ruin one persons life without consequence. Slightly damaging millions of lives should rise to a similar level at some point.
Databroker Files: How Apps and Data Brokers Enable Mass Surveillance